<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An insightful paper from Harvard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.thorlaser.com/an-insightful-paper-from-harvard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.thorlaser.com/an-insightful-paper-from-harvard/</link>
	<description>Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 15:33:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Carroll</title>
		<link>http://blog.thorlaser.com/an-insightful-paper-from-harvard/comment-page-1/#comment-6573</link>
		<dc:creator>James Carroll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 12:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thorlaser.com/?p=367#comment-6573</guid>
		<description>no, not true. The problem is J/cm2 is a bad way to record dose. You would get more than 30J/cm2 after a brief period of sunbathing on a hot sunny day. 

The risk of denaturing depends on power density (irradiance) W/cm2 not energy. I have not looked it up but if I had to guess I would say power densities in excess of say 10W/cm2 would cause denaturing. Maybe that is what you meant to write.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no, not true. The problem is J/cm2 is a bad way to record dose. You would get more than 30J/cm2 after a brief period of sunbathing on a hot sunny day. </p>
<p>The risk of denaturing depends on power density (irradiance) W/cm2 not energy. I have not looked it up but if I had to guess I would say power densities in excess of say 10W/cm2 would cause denaturing. Maybe that is what you meant to write.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike kim</title>
		<link>http://blog.thorlaser.com/an-insightful-paper-from-harvard/comment-page-1/#comment-5904</link>
		<dc:creator>mike kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thorlaser.com/?p=367#comment-5904</guid>
		<description>I have always been told that DNA protien is denatured at Laser powers at 10joules/cm2. Is this true??? Class IV therapy laser protocals all indicate &gt; 30 joules/CM2. Is this not a clear reason not to use high powers???

MIke kim

mkasso@aol.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have always been told that DNA protien is denatured at Laser powers at 10joules/cm2. Is this true??? Class IV therapy laser protocals all indicate &gt; 30 joules/CM2. Is this not a clear reason not to use high powers???</p>
<p>MIke kim</p>
<p><a href="mailto:mkasso@aol.com">mkasso@aol.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Bennett</title>
		<link>http://blog.thorlaser.com/an-insightful-paper-from-harvard/comment-page-1/#comment-5412</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 20:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thorlaser.com/?p=367#comment-5412</guid>
		<description>Excellent paper. Congratulations James! Confirms what is seen in practice. You can&#039;t hurry the process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent paper. Congratulations James! Confirms what is seen in practice. You can&#8217;t hurry the process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

