Monthly Archives: January 2014

LLLT Low level cold class IV laser therapy. Treat the skin directly, preferably in contact (or very close).

oh dear, I hope that none of this audience (you) are attempting to treat through clothing. Light does not go through clothing very well (if at all). You must treat the skin directly, preferably in contact (or very close).

These examples will not work

Screen Shot 2014-01-17 at 10.16.59 Screen Shot 2014-01-17 at 10.16.40 Screen Shot 2014-01-17 at 10.16.13 Screen Shot 2014-01-17 at 10.14.44 Screen Shot 2014-01-17 at 10.14.29 Screen Shot 2014-01-17 at 10.12.47

Posted in Rants | on LLLT Low level cold class IV laser therapy. Treat the skin directly, preferably in contact (or very close).

THOR Literature watch for November 2013 Low Level Laser Therapy / Cold Laser / Photobiomodulation PBM

43 LLLT papers for you this month including: Three systematic reviews with meta-analysis on LLLT 1) before, during and after exercises, 2) frozen shoulder/adhesive capsulitis, 3) subacromial impingement syndrome. ALSO a trial showing increased muscle torque in elite athletes, reduced oral mucositis in pediatric cancer patients, LED for TMJ dysfunction, Laser vs LED dentin hypersensitivity, combined autologous PRP and LED for venous ulcers, LED after eccentric exercise (it seems to be a big month for LEDs ) and delightful editorial from Kevin Moore on the early years for LLLT and the World Association for Laser Therapy (WALT).

Posted in Research | on THOR Literature watch for November 2013 Low Level Laser Therapy / Cold Laser / Photobiomodulation PBM

Kadhim-Saleh laser neck pain review conclusion incorrect. LLLT is clinically effective

Last October a systematic review on LLLT for neck pain was written by Kadhim-Saleh et al and published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine. They report that the evidence for LLLT in neck pain is inconclusive. The paper criticises the 2009 Lancet review by Roberta Chow & Bjordal et al on LLLT for non-specific neck pain claiming their review was more stringent. Well you have to read the rebuttal Bjordal shot back to the journal editor revealing the weakness, errors and fundamental flaws in the work of Kadhim-Saleh et al

Posted in Rants | 8 Comments

LLLT Systematic reviews with meta-analysis are hard to do

LLLT Systematic reviews with meta-analysis are hard to do for all sorts of reasons:

1) LLLT has had a lot of different names (cold laser, laser biostimulation, photobiomodulation, low intensity laser laser therapy, LEDT,  etc) so the literature search is hard (see my post on this from 2008, recently updated)

2) The authors need to have an advanced knowledge of the pathology in question.

3) The authors need to have an advanced knowledge of LLLT too, particularly the matter of irradiation parameters and dose*

4) Then the meta-analysis requires a high degree of competence with medical statistics (see how to write a systematic review with meta-analysis)

* So we should not be surprised when someone who looks at a broad range of interventions for a pathology with lmited knowledge of LLLT struggles (and often fails)  to stratify the data by effective irradiation parameters (wavelength, power, beam area, irradiance, pulses), dose (time, energy, fluence), treatment location, number of treatments and interval between treatments.

It may be that LLLT is not a suitable intervention for the pathology in question … Continue reading

Posted in Rants | on LLLT Systematic reviews with meta-analysis are hard to do

1946 book on Electrotherapy and Light Therapy

If you are familiar with many of the light therapy arguments today this should make you smile; I stumbled across a book published in 1946 called Electrotherapy and Light Therapy and I quite enjoyed the cautious speculation and many accuracies that we still discuss today.

The book is 694 pages long, the section on light and infrared therapies is 26 pages, here some samples for you.

Posted in Books and Journals | 1 Comment